Wal-Mart Critics Ask
'Where
Would Jesus Shop?'
By Bob Allen - EthicsDaily.com
December 13, 2005
Jesus would not shop at Wal-Mart, according to new
television ads and a letter signed by religious leaders.
"Our faith teaches us 'Do unto others as you would have them
do unto you,'" began the 30-second TV spot, which aired
Friday in Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Kentucky, Oklahoma and
Texas. "If these are our values, then ask yourself: should
people of faith shop at Wal-Mart this holiday season?"
Saying Wal-Mart has repeatedly broken child-labor laws, is
being sued by 1.5 million women for discrimination and that
600,000 Wal-Mart employees and their families do not have
company health care, the ad implies the nation's largest
retailer violates not only the spirit of Christmas, but also
the Golden Rule.
On Thursday 65 religious leaders, representing faith groups
with combined membership of 1.3 million, signed an open
letter urging Wal-Mart to "change, to become better, and to
embrace the best of American values," in order "to become a
truly responsible, ethical, and righteous company."
"Every day, Wal-Mart's so-called low prices come at a high
cost to the moral virtues and greatness of your workers, our
families, and our nation," the letter said. "Every day,
America pays too high a cost for Wal-Mart's immoral business
practices."
The faith-themed outreach is part of a broader effort by
Wake Up Wal-Mart, a group funded by the United Food and
Commercial Workers union, to raise awareness about company
practices, which they say include costing American jobs by
turning to sweat-shop labor overseas, suppressing wages in
the United States by eliminating competition and denying
workers the right to organize in labor unions.
A centerpiece of the campaign, Robert Greenwald's
controversial film "Wal-Mart: The High Cost of Low Price"
sold nearly 100,000 DVDs it its first month in release,
prompting Wal-Mart to launch its own PR campaign to counter
criticism from what it terms "special interest" groups.
On Friday Wal-Mart released a statement criticizing the UFCW
for "wasting" members' dues on "offensive, misguided
attempts to veil its attacks with religious overtones."
Religious leaders including Jesse Jackson of the
Rainbow/PUSH Coalition and United Church of Christ President
John H. Thomas said in their open letter to Wal-Mart CEO Lee
Scott that: "As all faiths teach us, the current
exploitation of those who work to provide us with goods and
services, whether at Wal-Mart or its suppliers, can never be
morally justified. Under all conditions, it is simply
immoral and wrong. It goes against the teachings of our
spiritual leaders and our commitment to justice, fairness,
and community."
"If there is one shared hope all faiths have in common, it
is the central belief that we must work together to improve
the lives of others," the leaders said. "This central tenet,
'do unto others as you would have them do unto you,' is the
bedrock of our values, our faith, our families and our
communities."
"Unfortunately, Wal-Mart needlessly ignores the Golden Rule
putting our children and their workers needlessly at-risk."
Wal-Mart spokesperson Sarah Clark said the religious leaders
"have unfortunately been misled." She claimed the company
this year created 100,000 new jobs, gave nearly $200 million
to charity and saved the average American family $2,300.
Wal-Mart CEO Lee Scott said he shares the religious leaders'
concern about "the number of our associates' children who
rely on public health programs."
"Even here, we're making positive change with new health
care programs that are already helping more associates get
private health insurance, at a time when other companies are
scaling back or dropping insurance all together," Scott
said. He lamented that "much of this 'good news' about
Wal-Mart goes unreported."
The religious leaders closed their letter with: "So
beginning today, in the shared spirit of the holiday season,
we call on Wal-Mart to change, to become better, and to
embrace the best of American values. It is within your power
to become a truly responsible, ethical, and righteous
company.
"In the end, there is no better present Wal-Mart could give
to its workers, their families, and America than to change
for the better this holiday season."
On Sunday in Framingham, Mass., a group of children
protesting Wal-Mart's alleged use of sweatshop labor was
asked to leave the store property after trying to present a
store manager with a letter detailing its concerns.
''This is the biggest and richest company in the world, and
they're using sweatshops," said Owen Weitzman, a 10-year-old
from Newton, Mass., quoted in the Boston Globe. Holding a
sign reading, ''Stop Sweatshops … Give workers living wages.
Don't hide under Bushes" and depicting a smiley face with
fangs, he continued: ''I hope over a more longer period of
time that sweatshops don't exist."
Bill Wertz, a company spokesman, said it is not Wal-Mart's
policy to sell products made in sweatshops. He said the
store is ''a target of a major campaign by union-based
organizations to tarnish our reputation."
Wal-Mart Wages and Worker Rights
A Substantial Number of Wal-Mart Associates earn far below
the poverty line
In 2001, the last year for which Wal-Mart has released figures for
most occupations, sales associates, the most common job in
Wal-Mart, earned on average $8.23 an hour for annual wages
of $13,861.The 2001 poverty line for a family of three was
$14,630. [“Is Wal-Mart Too Powerful?”, Business Week,
10/6/03 and US Dept of Health and Human Services 2001
Poverty Guidelines, 2001]
A 2003 wage analysis reported that cashiers, the second most common
job, earn approximately $7.92 per hour and work 29 hours a
week. This brings in annual wages of only $11,948.
[“Statistical Analysis of Gender Patterns in Wal-Mart’s
Workforce”, Dr. Richard Drogin 2003]"
Wal-Mart Associates don't earn enough to support a family
The national median family budget in the United States for a
two-person family (one parent and one child) in 1999 was
$23,705, well above the average associate's annual wages of
$13,861. [“Poverty and Family Budgets” online at
www.epinet.org]
Wal-Mart can afford wage increases
Wal-Mart can cover the cost of a dollar an hour wage increase by
raising prices a half penny per dollar. For instance, a
$2.00 pair of socks would then cost $2.01. This minimal
increase would annually add up to $1,800 for each employee.
[Analysis of Wal-Mart Annual Report 2005]
Wal-Mart forces employees to work off-the-clock
As of the printing of their 2005 Annual Report, Wal-Mart faced 44
wage and hour lawsuits. Major law-suits have either been won
or are working their way through the legal process in states
such as California, Indiana, Minnesota, New Jersey, Oregon,
and Washington. [Wal-Mart Annual Report 2005]
Wal-Mart was recently ordered by courts to pay up to 120 workers in
Gallup, New Mexico and 400 workers in 27 stores in Oregon
for violating wage and hour laws.
In 2002, statisticians estimated Wal-Mart shortchanged its Texas
workers $150 million over four years by regularly not paying
them for working through their 15-minute breaks. [Sources
include Associated Press, "Federal Jury Finds Wal-Mart
Guilty in Overtime Pay Case," Chicago Tribune, Business 3,
12/20/03 and Steven Greenhouse, “Suits Say Wal-Mart Forces
Workers to Toil Off the Clock,” New York Times, A1,
6/25/02)]
Wal-Mart violates the Fair Labor Standards Act
One week of time records from 25,000 employees in July 2000 found
1,371 instances of minors working too late, during school
hours, or for too many hours in a day. There were 60,767
missed breaks and 15,705 lost meal times. [Steven
Greenhouse, “Suits Say Wal-Mart Forces Workers to Toil Off
the Clock,” New York Times, A1, 6/25/02]
Wal-Mart Anti-Union Policy
Wal-Mart closes down stores and departments that unionize
In 2000, when a small meatcutting department successfully organized
a union at a Wal-Mart store in Texas, Wal-Mart responded a
week later by announcing the phase-out of its in-store
meatcutting company-wide. [Pan Demetrakakes, "Is Wal-Mart
Wrapped in Union Phobia?" Food & Packaging 76 (August 1,
2003).]
A Wal-Mart employee in Quebec filed a request in a Canadian
Superior Court seeking a class-action lawsuit against
Wal-Mart Canada, saying the retailer’s decision to close a
Jonquierre, Quebec, store after its employees received union
certification violated the rights of its workers, and
entitles them to compensation and damages. [Quebec Union
Seeks Class-Action Suit vs. Wal-Mart,” Supermarket News,
April 22, 2005]
Wal-Mart has issued "A Manager's Toolbox to Remaining Union
Free,"
This toolbox provides managers with lists of warning signs that
workers might be organizing, including "frequent meetings at
associates' homes" and "associates who are never seen
together start talking or associating with each other." The
"Toolbox" gives managers a hotline to call so that company
specialists can respond rapidly and head off any attempt by
employees to organize. [Wal-Mart, A Manager’s Toolbox to
Remaining Union Free at 20-21]
Wal-Mart is committed to an anti-union policy
In the last few years, well over 100 unfair labor practice charges
have been filed against Wal-Mart throughout the country,
with 43 charges filed in 2002 alone.
Since 1995, the U.S. government has been forced to issue at least
60 complaints against Wal-Mart at the National Labor
Relations Board. [International Confederation of Free Trade
Unions (ICFTU), Internationally Recognised Core Labour
Standards in the United States: Report for the WTO General
Council Review of the Trade Policies of the United States
(Geneva, January 14-16, 2004)]
Wal-Mart’s labor law violations range from illegally firing workers
who attempt to organize a union to unlawful surveillance,
threats, and intimidation of employees who dare to speak
out. [“Everyday Low Wages: The Hidden Price We All Pay for
Wal-Mart," A Report by the Democratic Staff of the Committee
on Education and the Workforce, 2/16/04]
|
FAIR
USE NOTICE |
|
This site contains copyrighted material the use
of which has not always been specifically
authorized by the copyright owner. We are making
such material available in our efforts to
advance understanding of environmental,
political, human rights, economic, democracy,
scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We
believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any
such copyrighted material as provided for in
section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In
accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the
material on this site is distributed without
profit to those who have expressed a prior
interest in receiving the included information
for research and educational purposes. For more
information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
If you wish to use copyrighted material from
this site for purposes of your own that go
beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission
from the copyright owner. |